Profile avatar
stevenmazie.bsky.social
SCOTUS correspondent for The Economist. Political studies prof at Bard Early College-Manhattan.
889 posts 21,332 followers 710 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
Posts 14 Comments 36

TL;DR: ✅ Trump gets to claim giant victory ✅ Substantive constitutional violation soon blocked in lower courts through procedural workarounds ✅ Roberts stays above the fray ✅ Barrett rehabilitates conservative credentials (Alito concurrence warning against "loophole" = further evidence)

submitted 18 hours ago • 2 comments

v interesting 🧵 speculating / gaming out the angles in Trump v CASA

submitted 1 day ago • 1 comment

I’ve been thinking about Barrett’s majority in Trump v. CASA yesterday and Roberts’s decision to assign her the opinion. Some observations/speculation…

submitted 1 day ago • 5 comments

And ... it's out. Our episode on SCOTUS's latest complicity with Trump's lawlessness @profmmurray.bsky.social @kateshaw.bsky.social @leahlitman.bsky.social : crooked.com/podcast/scot...

submitted 2 days ago • 15 comments

SCOTUS's conservative majority is risking a chaotic patchwork citizenship policy with today's ruling in Trump v CASA. As I write in @economist.com, even if that does not come to pass, Trump will now see smoother sailing for other parts of his agenda www.economist.com/united-state...

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

Let's all have a good chuckle at Justice Barrett citing Marbury v Madison—the case in which SCOTUS claimed for itself the ultimate power of judicial review—to show how sometimes judges can't do certain things.

submitted 2 days ago • 7 comments

This is the headline. Schools caving into parents with religious objections to gay-themed books. Making LGBT people less seen and less welcome in civil society.

submitted 2 days ago • 1 comment

it is the Imperial Judiciary when courts say that presidents can’t unilaterally overturn constitutional text, and the Proper Order of Things when courts say that your rights rest on the whims of who happens to be in office

submitted 2 days ago • 113 comments

Yes. This is about the ability of courts to stop all the OTHER lawless aspects of Trump's agenda. That ability is now seriously impaired.

submitted 2 days ago • 0 comments

SCOTUS CLOSING DAY Opinions at 10 AM Here’s what’s coming. Follow me here for all the details.

submitted 2 days ago • 15 comments

SCOTUS CLOSING DAY Opinions at 10 AM Here’s what’s coming. Follow me here for all the details.

submitted 2 days ago • 15 comments

A look with @daniellaraz.bsky.social at what might explain plummeting support for same-sex marriage among Republicans on Obergefell’s 10th birthday — w insights from @leahlitman.bsky.social and @profmmurray.bsky.social @economist.com economist.com/united-state...

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

The Senate parliamentarian may soon have gentle, reasoned all-caps presidential social media posts directed her way www.nytimes.com/live/2025/06...

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

BIG DAY AT SCOTUS TOMORROW A half-dozen opinions coming: - age verification for online porn - opt-outs for religious parents from LGBT content in schools - Louisiana's congressional map - FCC fees for broadband in rural areas - ACA preventive care - birthright citizenship/nationwide injunctions

submitted 3 days ago • 6 comments