"At Neurosurgical Review, a Springer Nature title, letters, comments, and editorials comprised 58% of the total output from January to October—up from 9% last year."
"in the preceding 2 months, three authors from one university in India had published “an astonishing 69 comments” in the journal."
"in the preceding 2 months, three authors from one university in India had published “an astonishing 69 comments” in the journal."
Reposted from
Science Magazine
A new Science and Retraction Watch investigation finds AI-generated commentary articles flood the literature with poor-quality publications and casts doubt on metrics of scholarly output and impact. scim.ag/4gJmD6O
Comments