Let's be very clear here. What people making this argument are saying is that Le Pen and Trump should be *above* the law.
They're saying that sitting leaders should interfere with the judiciary to make people running for president immune from laws that apply to everyone else.
They're saying that sitting leaders should interfere with the judiciary to make people running for president immune from laws that apply to everyone else.
Comments
However, What is "naive" about his public opinion on the Russian war of aggression? I'd not call it "naive", but "putinist", in particular for somebody theoretically with culture and acccess to information. He's totally congruent supporting Le Pen. Another example of the horseshoe theory.
If elected (or even might be elected) then can’t be prosecuted to the extent of the law.
Once elected can carry out sentences without a prosecution.
#SupremeCourtiers 😳
https://bsky.app/profile/colinbaines15.bsky.social/post/3lliwhqmgh22j
If you want to see a genuine democracy that functions under the rule of law and due process look at the LePen judgment.