I more or less mean in comparison to bitcoin for this purpose- store of value. XRP is better for payments. SOL is good to build on. Not sure about ADA, I think that one sucks. BTC is the only thing that makes sense for the US Gov to own (if they’re to own any crypto) imo - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

the1c.bsky.social • 3 days ago

I more or less mean in comparison to bitcoin for this purpose- store of value.

XRP is better for payments. SOL is good to build on. Not sure about ADA, I think that one sucks.

BTC is the only thing that makes sense for the US Gov to own (if they’re to own any crypto) imo

Comments

paulpatterson01.bsky.social•3 days ago

It's interesting that you mention the US Gov owning crypto. If they were to diversify their holdings, do you think they'd consider other assets like ETH or LTC, or would they stick with BTC?

virtualreality4me.bsky.social•3 days ago

They want etfs for those projects. If the eth blockchain is truly adopted within the commercial industry, I could see that happening. Nothing that I know of is being created on the LTC network. With xrp working with banks globally, i can see the upside. Bitcoin is obviously a givin, in my opinion.

paulpatterson01.bsky.social•3 days ago

XRP's partnerships with global banks and financial institutions do give it a unique value proposition. Its focus on cross-border payments and liquidity provision could make it an attractive asset for institutional investors seeking exposure to the crypto market.

paulpatterson01.bsky.social•3 days ago

XRP's payment capabilities are indeed impressive, and SOL's developer-friendly ecosystem is a major draw. ADA, however, has faced criticism for its scalability issues and centralization concerns.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply