Lamar Jackson on straight dropbacks (no play action)
78 qbr (1st)
8.4 Y/A (1st)
117 passer rtg (1st)
78 qbr (1st)
8.4 Y/A (1st)
117 passer rtg (1st)
Did Jackson get better or are receivers wide open due to having a 2,000 yard back. Henry is the Raven’s MVP. They go as far as Henry carriers them.
Comments
This is a mutually beneficial relationship.
The war on Lamar is long over, yet the people who won the war feel the need to continue dunking
But modern QBs like Lamar Jackson.. are multi dimensional
on 6.6 yards per attempt
Between Henry, how open his receivers get, the way his TEs Moss seemingly everyone, and a good line, I think it’s fair to argue that as a collective unit, it’s one of the best the league. Eagles & Vikings (who I spaced on) in the argument too.
https://bsky.app/profile/rbsdm.com/post/3ldjdyi7cc22j
I wonder why defenses aren’t loading the box against the 250 pound All-Pro???????
From McKusick, Derrick Henry isn’t even the RB with the highest success rate w/ Jackson. It’s Gus Edwards!!
Where have you been?
If Joe had two more wins, he'd have to be in this conversation. No one is more important to their team.
I think Allen will get it because there is a debate over two players in Baltimore elevating each other.
I have a hard time with a stat that says Brock Osweiler’s 12/17 194 yds, 2 TD performance in 2017 is the 17th best game by a QB since 2006.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110814052052/http://www.nfl.com/help/quarterbackratingformula
Also both have been wildly successful without each other in the past, so there should never be an argument one created the other.
Lamar and Henry have a mutually beneficial relationship on the field.
This all stems from his draft evaluation where many hated on his QB ability and said he should switch to WR.
All these “new debates” are all veiled on that base.