PSA: the best way to encourage maintainers NOT to deal with an open issue or PR is to ask "any updates?"
GitHub is the source of truth. All updates are there before your question. If it's important to you: create a better reproduction, share new use cases, contribute test cases, review tradeoffs
GitHub is the source of truth. All updates are there before your question. If it's important to you: create a better reproduction, share new use cases, contribute test cases, review tradeoffs
Comments
even with PRs ready. even after people beg them to do it, for years on end, wasting work of all the others that came before them completely.
bad OSS etiquette goes both ways.
do not make people write these comments.
We should bring back old school forums!
and github is not source of truth because a lot of maintainer will work locally or in a private repo before pushing to the public repo
I do think there are instances where a long-standing popular issue could use a prompting for context on what may be delaying progress, especially if it's a very impactful issue and it's unclear what the next steps are.
Relying on (usually unpaid) OSS means this is *your code*; if you need other behaviors (esp. on a short timeline), take control & patch. Even the most thorough & least demanding issue might take time depending on maintainers' schedules.
And with the rise of stale bots issues and PR:s got punished if they were inactive, so contributors were taught to ensure that they add activity to their issues and PR:s or else risk them getting closed
Lots of people don’t dare to contribute out of fear of doing wrong.
I think a message like yours affect those people more than it affects those who already feels entitled to ask.
As for the fear of doing something wrong, contributions are a wide spectrum 🌈 it doesn’t have to be a PR, as described in the first post. There are so many ways to help!
I don’t think they really believe that, I think that’s just a roundabout way of asking “could you guys continue working on this?”
“What is blocking this from progressing?”
“Can I do something else to push this forward?”
The PR author’s perceived entitlement to get an update vs the maintainer’s perceived entitlement of not getting asked for an update.
I would much rather focus on collaboration than battling over entitlements 😕