ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
robdickinson.bsky.social
•
98 days ago
Have a look
https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Documents/Fast-track-consenting/Southland-Wind-Farm/Application-documents-/Amended-docs-5-July-2024/Southland-Wind-Farm-Part-B-Assessment-of-Environmental-Effects-Redacted-Version-4-7-24.pdf
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
cindybax.bsky.social
•
97 days ago
hmmm - doesn't contain the DOC info. Interested to see what they said. I find it so weird that DOC said it was ok but it was the farmers who argued for the native vegetation! Seems a bit upside down 🙃
1
2
reply
[–]
cindybax.bsky.social
•
97 days ago
Not so sure that one can argue DOC "supported" it - the DOC evidence has some serious caveats. Especially about the long tailed bats. Said to remove eight turbines, turn off turbines if bats detected, disagreed w removing vegetation to reduce bat numbers...
https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Documents/Fast-track-consenting/Southland-Wind-Farm/Comments/25Jul24_Department-of-Conservation_FTC126_Comments-Received.pdf
1
reply
[–]
robdickinson.bsky.social
•
97 days ago
There are probably more documents out there but I have a day job already
0
1
reply
[–]
cindybax.bsky.social
•
97 days ago
haha yep I just took a good 20 mins out of my day job!
easily distracted: have some difficult editing to do
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Documents/Fast-track-consenting/Southland-Wind-Farm/Comments/25Jul24_Department-of-Conservation_FTC126_Comments-Received.pdf
easily distracted: have some difficult editing to do