This rather helpfully makes my point about disordered discourse.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/mar/01/live-european-leaders-rally-behind-zelenskyy-after-trump-vance-clash-updates?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-67c35c298f089e8672a053ef#block-67c35c298f089e8672a053ef
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/mar/01/live-european-leaders-rally-behind-zelenskyy-after-trump-vance-clash-updates?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-67c35c298f089e8672a053ef#block-67c35c298f089e8672a053ef
Comments
Also note that the people involved, esp. V. Nuland and A. Vindman, play regular roles as bogeypeople in the Right's conspiracy theories.
(there's even a Rescue Mediums episode about this couple)
However, the suggestion that Zelensky, after leading his country through 3 years of war, had to be TOLD to be strong immediately stinks of bullshit.
A joke would be something unimaginable, like Obama flew in like a miniature ant man into zelenskys ear to dictate the conversation.
Also, a joke is funny, she is not funny.
So does she realise her life is funded by making shit up?
I'm pretty sure it wasn't in her career choices.
What am I missing here?
Your image is creepy too, just in a different way.
Kelly who wasn’t really a war hero. (Didn’t McCain have to go through the same treatment?)
All the lying in order to get into war with Iraq.
Systematically opposing any political measure coming from the Obama administration (After all he was born in Kenya and he is a radical communist or something of the sort).
Trump is just the end of the line (hopefully).