Refusing to vote for a genocidal administration is understandable, even if you disagree with it strategically. The primary responsibility for losing the support of such voters lies with the supporters of the genocide. If Joe hadn't insisted on sponsoring a genocide, Kamala might be President today.
being fixated on the idea that it was all about joe or kamala is what I mean by short-sighted, and I’m putting it very kindly with this choice of word.
joe is relaxing in delaware and the world has to cope with this childish “punishment”.
I think this "punishment" notion is misguided. 2020 Biden voters who didn't vote for Harris may have felt that it was simply wrong to vote for a genocidal administration. Or maybe they were soured on the whole system by the apparent rule by uniparty. Or maybe they were just demotivated.
this election wasn’t about joe or kamala. it was about trump or not trump. even if one thinks dems are just the lesser evil, they’re still the decidedly LESSER evil. this was not the time to sulk and pout.
I reached the same conclusion, but it is a fact that some voters think genocide is simply unacceptable. Voters should never have been presented with a choice where genocide was the lesser of two evils. That choice was presented by Biden/Harris, and they bear responsibility for the outcome.
Comments
Sit down.
joe is relaxing in delaware and the world has to cope with this childish “punishment”.
Fascist police gangs brutalizing unarmed voters and drilling record amounts of oil were just the cherry on top.
Speaking of useless.