It's not the length, it's that the parts of the name that's numerical is numerically sorted, the rest is alphabetically sorted.
Should be able to disable this with a group policy or some registry fiddling:
https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/91417-enable-disable-numerical-sorting-file-explorer-windows-10-a.html
(I haven't tried it, so can't vouch for it.)
Should be able to disable this with a group policy or some registry fiddling:
https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/91417-enable-disable-numerical-sorting-file-explorer-windows-10-a.html
(I haven't tried it, so can't vouch for it.)
Comments
https://archives.miloush.net/michkap/archive/2005/01/05/346933.html
https://blog.codinghorror.com/sorting-for-humans-natural-sort-order/
Hmm... Now of course I can't help thinking about whether this can efficiently be implemented in SQL 😇