Linda Reynolds admits she gave ‘incorrect evidence’ at Lehrmann's criminal trial. www.lawyerly.com.au/linda-reynol... - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

jondeeoz.bsky.social • 105 days ago

Linda Reynolds admits she gave ‘incorrect evidence’ at Lehrmann's criminal trial.

https://www.lawyerly.com.au/linda-reynolds-admits-she-gave-incorrect-evidence-at-bruce-lehrmanns-criminal-trial/

Comments

captain-chaos.bsky.social•104 days ago

She did perjure herself...

maggiedawitch.bsky.social•104 days ago

Liar, liar...
Of course with zero consequences ffs

demwar.bsky.social•104 days ago

Is that the fancy way of saying perjury?

captain-chaos.bsky.social•104 days ago

It is indeed.

fredbear02.bsky.social•105 days ago

Caught out again , did she qualify her answers with (to best of my recollection ) when she gave evidence , or give it as a matter of fact ? Bit late now admitting she couldn't remember . 😡😡

aeb1.bsky.social•104 days ago

So perjured herself. There are penalties for that.

Should automatically disqualify her from public life. Spoilt privilege

jenniferphilp.bsky.social•104 days ago

Hi Linda

notsofastjanice.bsky.social•104 days ago

Isn’t there a legal term for that ? Not to mention consequences? 🙄

theweatherboard9.bsky.social•104 days ago

She lied; because she's a congenital liar... 🙄

harchpops.bsky.social•103 days ago

drajardine.bsky.social•103 days ago

Incorrect evidence
Is that what we are calling it now

wotaboutthat.bsky.social•103 days ago

Well colour me shocked…

rowdyrebel.bsky.social•104 days ago

Vicious horrible woman!

fireypete.bsky.social•105 days ago

The rest of us plebs would be facing perjury charges. Maybe the AFP has a soft spot for Linda’s dodgy ticker.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply