Foale might have a point if parents were dragging councils to tribunal needlessly, with council decisions upheld at 98% of hearings
She might have a point if the law contained no provision for councils to refuse 'the best' on grounds of efficient use of resources
But the reverse is true, x2
She might have a point if the law contained no provision for councils to refuse 'the best' on grounds of efficient use of resources
But the reverse is true, x2
Comments
It's painfully obvious sometimes that no-one in positions of decision-making power reads these, or learns from them
No parent stopping their chemo, draining their savings, or leaving their job to mount a SEND appeal is 'getting a better deal' https://bsky.app/profile/johngroberts.bsky.social/post/3liyte6iizs27
https://bsky.app/profile/johngroberts.bsky.social/post/3liytjvttw227
A line that implies it's 'rational', not maladministration, for public officials to commit serial unlawful acts https://bsky.app/profile/johngroberts.bsky.social/post/3liytpr3n7s27
https://bsky.app/profile/johngroberts.bsky.social/post/3liytpr3n7s27
But that's not what's happening, and the CCN lead for SEND should surely know that
So back we go: misinformed, incompetent, or plain lying to our faces?