Ideally 5 years to drill into issues, but what about risk of excluding voices from assembly, incl those not swayed by renumeration (no matter how significant)? Single parents & carers, early career, education, young & old, gender & health dimensions. All moot though: we're not in charge 😅
That's why it has to be significant. To exclude as few as possible. It's not about "swaying" people as much as enabling participation
Perfection is a goal, but "vast improvement on the current system" would be reason enough to start with. Also would need to allow people to resign with no penalties.
Comments
Perfection is a goal, but "vast improvement on the current system" would be reason enough to start with. Also would need to allow people to resign with no penalties.