— which is possible considering the tide was already turning against her. Both sides are claiming evidence that disproves the other party’s accusations, which will be key to the damages and “who shot first” claim altogether.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I’m sure I don’t fully understand the nuances, but the article and text messages seem to indicate they were trying to harm her reputation to cast doubt on her accusations of his misconduct (which are corroborated many times over). Why would they want to “bury her” other than to change the subject?
I’m focused on what’s true so the rest of it is less interesting if you remove that element. But you are in that industry so I can see why your view of this is different from mine. And also probably correct 😂
(I know better than to argue with someone about their chosen field of expertise)
Comments
The texts, while awful, don’t indicate they planted false stories. The reaction to the article further proves the hypothesis of the whole saga.
I’m not saying what’s true or isn’t, but the public’s willingness to follow a narrative is the center of this story.
(I know better than to argue with someone about their chosen field of expertise)