I get why Altman and Amodei feel compelled to write big-think posts. But they’re in a position where it can’t be done well. They’ve promised investors a pace of change that would imply massive disruption and conflict, if true. But they have to tell us it will be smooth. So it comes off v insincere.
Comments
Prosperty and innovation in a generic way, sure. But a lot of it is worse than anything even Musk ever said.
https://techcrunch.com/2024/12/26/microsoft-and-openai-have-a-financial-definition-of-agi-report/
But I think we can infer they promised a pace of change something like what they’re describing in these blog posts, and I think we can infer they promised it would be profitable.
https://bsky.app/profile/mockingjaysongs.bsky.social/post/3lr7qow7z422d
These posts are infuriating (Altman’s).
"do tasks" is such a weasel statement it should be working for Judge Doom.