Something I try to explain to tech peeps/investors is the danger of seeing yourself as the outcome, rather than the enabler.
It leads to creating 'value' that isn't valuable to the user. It just complicates their journey to the outcome you are meant to deliver.
Facebook is speed-running that. /1
It leads to creating 'value' that isn't valuable to the user. It just complicates their journey to the outcome you are meant to deliver.
Facebook is speed-running that. /1
Reposted from
Daily Dot
“Big influencers need to start looking at Meta sideways after this. They making these fake AI accounts so they don’t have to pay y’all for content."
"They are manufacturing the human experience ... This is a threat to all of us.”
READ MORE: www.dailydot.com/debug/meta-a...
"They are manufacturing the human experience ... This is a threat to all of us.”
READ MORE: www.dailydot.com/debug/meta-a...
Comments
Maybe even still exists, but I'm not going to try and find out.
I’m really starting to wonder how fast a clean Facebook competitor that only shows you friends and family could take off
Facebook is vulnerable
That's the outcome people wanted (and largely still want). Facebook's PRODUCT was that it provided a simple, and even passive, way to reach that outcome. /2
Facebook was just an early (not first) mover in the space, hitting at the EXACT time that javascript and server tech was good enough to make the experience very user friendly. /3
Because maintaining social connections until then was enormously time consuming, particularly for women, as that's mostly where the emotional labour in families always falls. /5
The product was the REAL connections it enabled. /6
Everything else is 'me as the product' -- which I'll accept for the core value to me.
"People are using Facebook to connect."
Becomes:
"People are using Facebook." /7