Personally, I couldn't ever justify spending that much on a body but I do understand that perspective. IMO a lot of people take the wrong perspective in viewing the sensor size purely as a downgrade compared to full frame instead of a side grade
I think people who love to compare and moan about sensor formats are the ones who only collect gear to look at it rather than bother taking meaningful photographs.
These days there are slim differences between FF & APS-C And MFT apart from low light (which OM-3 seems to handle okay’ish)
that's what I'm saying. Comparing ruins fun. If the OM-3 is a good camera, it's a good camera. If the z50 is a good camera, it's a good camera. Simple as that. The MFT platform can be very fun and it's hard to argue with that stylish design and all the features.
All I can say is that limitation sparks creativity.
Camera is a tool, like a paintbrush. What you capture is the end result filled with emotions and thoughts.
Unless you're pixel peeping and looking at every single noise on the image.
Comments
OM-3 as a MFT is a very capable camera from what I’ve been seeing and I’ve been thinking of getting something lighter for my travels.
These days there are slim differences between FF & APS-C And MFT apart from low light (which OM-3 seems to handle okay’ish)
Camera is a tool, like a paintbrush. What you capture is the end result filled with emotions and thoughts.
Unless you're pixel peeping and looking at every single noise on the image.