Truly nerdy. A new US paper repeats its view that WTO litigation can’t say whether an “essential security measure” is legal. It calls for a definitive interpretation to that effect. It suggests a “rebalancing” solution via nullification and impairment. I did warn you.

https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/Jobs/DSB/10.pdf&Open=True