As well as the Court finding the 'cuts' motive was not adequately disclosed to consultees, the judgment provides striking evidence about how limited the internal DWP work had been on how its plans would actually lead to disabled people finding work. See eg §120 (screenshot)
That second point seems to me to be particularly important as and when DWP reconsult on WCA reforms. Just magically hoping that threatening more sanctions and cutting more incomes will lead to people finding suitable work is not good enough.
Comments