how does either of your theories work in a case like this? Plaintiffs are the states, not the civil servants. Suit filed in a single district, but obviously includes claims from far beyond the district
on your theories, the district court could do nothing with the claims of most of the plaintiffs here, and could do nothing that benefited the actual people involved. even going through the process of a trial on the merits, nothing could be done.
Only upon working up through a first appeal and then hearing by the SC, generally a fairly long process, could anything be done for people improperly fired.
In practice, your view is that it is good that people are fired in violation of the law and that they have no redress.
If it got overturned a couple years later that they would be better off because they would’ve been working other jobs and then they would still get backpay and get their job back if they want it.
I don't think you understand how expensive and tedious litigation is
But, also, these people were fired with dishonest claims that they were fired for poor performance. I recognize that you don't view bearing false witness as bad, but you must be aware that this makes it more difficult to get a job
Just circling back to this. your actual position, which you explained later, is that a president should not stop because the courts are irrelevant. Your view is that the constitution, which you took an oath to uphold, does not matter. https://bsky.app/profile/voicefromthemtn.bsky.social/post/3lkgy2ucq322n
This is darkly humorous, as you claim expertise on the law of Christ. And, yet, you think bearing false witness is good. You especially think it is good in service of harming people.
Comments
how does either of your theories work in a case like this? Plaintiffs are the states, not the civil servants. Suit filed in a single district, but obviously includes claims from far beyond the district
https://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/News%20Documents/030625_Maryland_v_USDA_complaint.pdf
In practice, your view is that it is good that people are fired in violation of the law and that they have no redress.
But, also, these people were fired with dishonest claims that they were fired for poor performance. I recognize that you don't view bearing false witness as bad, but you must be aware that this makes it more difficult to get a job
I take it back, you don't want a king, kings can't get away with what you support. You want a dictator
https://bsky.app/profile/voicefromthemtn.bsky.social/post/3lkeitb5cck23
That’s why they have been taken to court.
Suddenly you change your opinion simply because that’s what Trump is arguing.
Completlely as expected.