A genuine question.
Would it have been better for Democrats to be revealing this as part of their oversight job, while undermining the idea that waste and abuse are present at scale, or is it better to have the media expose this assuming it may be received as non-partisan?
Would it have been better for Democrats to be revealing this as part of their oversight job, while undermining the idea that waste and abuse are present at scale, or is it better to have the media expose this assuming it may be received as non-partisan?
Reposted from
Carl Quintanilla
Another six-byline alarm on DOGE’s specious accounting.
“That contract wasn’t canceled by DOGE or anyone else,” he said. “If they took credit for canceling the contract, they’re lying.”
@nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/21/u...
“That contract wasn’t canceled by DOGE or anyone else,” he said. “If they took credit for canceling the contract, they’re lying.”
@nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/21/u...
Comments
The passive reactive strategy may work to keep individual jobs, but it may lose a democracy.