Not that taking any action to alleviate and combat illegal occupation, including military force, is "extremism". It's actually a public duty, as was made clear during the occupation of France by the Nazis; resistance was a moral imperative, collusion was left to the fascist sympathisers.
How it is extremism responding violently to sistemic occupation, extermination, carpet bombing, ethnic cleansing... Are not the zionazis and the American Empire the extremists???
Really? Because that is exactly why they did the attack in the first place. If you have a family member that is killed you are likely to seek retaliation againist those who did it. 1 of 2
2 of 2 Afghanistan is a good example. The Taliban was a small group. Yet after 10 years of fighting americans before our last airplane left the airport the were heading into the capital. This overreaction by gov always makes terrorist stronger.
Comments
Bombing a small strip of land for over a year with 2000lb bombs, now that's extremist.
https://bsky.app/profile/alexjanevski.bsky.social/post/3lfprepfa2c2n