When physicians with access to A.I. are compared with A.I. for virtual urgent care visits
The A.I. performed better @annalsofim.bsky.social
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03283
The A.I. performed better @annalsofim.bsky.social
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03283
Comments
It’s clearly not you.
"Findings suggest that AI performed better in identifying critical red flags and supporting guideline-adherent care, whereas physicians were better at adapting recommendations to changing information during consultations."
Same things happened with autos, computers, Photoshop, CGI, etc.
https://transformer-circuits.pub/2025/attribution-graphs/biology.html#dives-medical
Do you invest in or work with K Health?
That’s so fucked up. So MAHA.
An experienced Board Certified primary care physician does not need AI for those conditions.
One may need AI for headache, chest pain, abdominal pain or multiple symptoms.
Older doctors are often a problem because they’re too inclined to rely on their experience, which affects their assessment of likely diagnoses. Younger doctors rely more on what they learned in Med School and are more likely to be right.
Forget AI, you’d get similar results if you just made doctors use Google more often!
I have seen grotesque errors lately in such transcripts.
If the doctors are working from real world evidence and the AI works from transcripts, a judge working from the transcripts could judge incorrectly.