🇺🇦🤔 Ukraine could automatically become a member of NATO if Russia violates ceasefire after war is resolved, — The Guardian
🇺🇸 Several US senators have developed a plan that would tie Ukraine's NATO membership to the situation on the Russian-Ukrainian border.
🇺🇸 Several US senators have developed a plan that would tie Ukraine's NATO membership to the situation on the Russian-Ukrainian border.
Comments
Only hard power in the form of weapons matters, nothing else.
How would that work if they've been invaded? If they have been invaded, it's already too late.
The only way is to deploy European troops in Ukraine, arm them to the teeth, and do not give Russia an inch. Actual guarantees.
The USA will abandon NATO. At a critical time.
That will leave Ukraine as the biggest army in NATO.
Give the fucking nukes to Ukraine and let's ramp up from there.
Everywhere else he’s a snake.
To pretend it's anything else is idiocy. Willful ignorance designed to deceive and destroy NATO.
If they don't join NATO, but Russia attacks, then they're suddenly in NATO and article 5....
What's the difference?
This sounds like a sleight of hand...
These people think we are stupid AF.
🤔
I know one when I see one.
If you're so ready, let's accept Ukraine as soon as the war is over.
As thats pretty much making them a member, Russia violates, NATO intervenes
I wouldn't trust using F35s though.
And why not now then? Where wait for the next war?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
However I'm not sure if these govs will be there in December 2025.
Fico (SK) lost majority in parliament and Orbán's party (HU) is losing against guy from opposition (the election is next year).
#SK
#Orban
#Fico
It won't work now...
Either something like You said (f. ex. 80%) or a valid veto should include at least f. ex. 3 countries.
Do they become a member IMMEDIATELY?
Is ARTICLE 5 then triggered IMMEDIATELY?
Unless both of these are true then it's not much of a deterrent.
If they are both true then why not let Ukraine join now?