50k @BMA.org.uk doctors:
Condemn the Supreme Court ruling defining the term 'woman' with respect to the EA2010 as being based on 'biological sex', which they refer to as a person who 'was at birth of the female sex' as reductive, trans and intersex-exclusionary and biologically nonsensical"
1/
Condemn the Supreme Court ruling defining the term 'woman' with respect to the EA2010 as being based on 'biological sex', which they refer to as a person who 'was at birth of the female sex' as reductive, trans and intersex-exclusionary and biologically nonsensical"
1/
Reposted from
The BMA
Attendees at the #RDconf last Saturday voted on an emergency motion to show their opposition to the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman.
Read the motion below 👇
BMA-wide policy is set at the Annual Representative Meeting (ARM) in June 2025.
Read the motion below 👇
BMA-wide policy is set at the Annual Representative Meeting (ARM) in June 2025.
Comments
Lot of things wrong with this Supreme Court decision, especially in light of no evidence from transgender people
2/
i. Reiterates the BMA's position on affirming the rights of transgender and non-binary individuals to live their lives with dignity, having their identity respected.
3/
4/
5/
6/
It should be taken very seriously by Labour, Starmer and Streeting. But it will be ignored of course.
Hopefully this will stimulate a resistance that helps win back our rights or and our long gone dignity