The other perspective of genocide - ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

beneltham.bsky.social • 1 day ago

The other perspective of genocide

The second half of this quote deserves to be remembered in the history books

Comments

How the fuck do you provide an alternative view to genocide? An entire race of people is eradicated from the planet - but the ABC is compelled to provide an alternative view??? Are these imbeciles out of their fucking minds? The national broadcaster is not required to give Nazis equal air time

margmmelb.bsky.social•1 day ago

Explains a lot - ABC has lost its way

tastromo.bsky.social•1 day ago

That’s unbelievably cooked, holy shit

carogil.bsky.social•1 day ago

What is the other perspective? The bombs/missiles/snipers all accidentally deployed their weapons? The thousands of innocent victims suicided en masse? There is no 'other' and it isn't 'perspective', it is reality.

harvey-normal.bsky.social•1 day ago

We might be against it but some Aussies enjoy that kind of thing.

aussieglitter72.bsky.social•1 day ago

WTAF!?! 😳

mrdenmore.bsky.social•1 day ago

That’s the one where you say ‘on the one hand, tens of thousands of innocent people have been slaughtered and deprived of their homeland, but on the other we tidied up the coast and built condos.’

miggieblue.bsky.social•1 day ago

The ABC’s behaviour in this matter is utterly shameful. You cannot ‘both sides’ the reporting on a visible and active genocide 😳🤬

mrdenmore.bsky.social•1 day ago

The ABC’s problem is just that - an absence of hard- nosed journalistic judgement. It’s what happens when you don’t have an editor in chief. Their CEO is a partisan-appointed hack. Not sure why people can’t see this.

wordstoprint.bsky.social•1 day ago

Yep, Gavin Fang works for the #abcnews, for a moment I thought he might have worked in some far away backwater….

Someone in the ABC reposted a Human Rights Watch article without a problem, then Antoinette Lattouf did and the Zionists went ballistic.

Imagine the ABC reporting a genocide accurately.

mybloodyvinyltime.bsky.social•1 day ago

You can’t have genocide without a “genocider” AND a “genocidee”, the blame is clearly 50/50 😬

woots2621.bsky.social•1 day ago

That sort of waffle is usually from someone satirising the issue.

ktuena.bsky.social•1 day ago

Alarming, isn’t it? What is the other perspective of genocide?

jenniferphilp.bsky.social•1 day ago

What would that "other side" be? They asked for it? Ffs

rb-citizen.bsky.social•1 day ago

No. Surely it means the ABC must think there are "fine" genocides too.

jenniferphilp.bsky.social•1 day ago

Who knows 🤷‍♀️ Certainly not me

triskeltic.bsky.social•1 day ago

Speechless.

maubsa.bsky.social•1 day ago

Duh & that is 🤔😂

human007.bsky.social•1 day ago

I shall leave this here without comment

https://literaturestudies.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/SAPoetry.pdf

frankauz.bsky.social•1 day ago

Yeah - be sure to report the perspective of the aggressor that hasn't quite finished exterminating 'the other' as yet!

It would be disingenuous and anti-journalistic to prematurely label an activity as genocidal before the final victim has been afforded their cultural rites.

timmydownawell.bsky.social•1 day ago

Very fine people on both sides, eh?

lucytartan.bsky.social•1 day ago

Fuuuuuugggghhhh what???!!? What!!!

75andrunningstrong.bsky.social•1 day ago

WTFFFF🙄

paulobear.bsky.social•1 day ago

This is where we are. We have been here for almost 10 years. Insanity.
Australian media with exception of very few journalists are culpable of long term bullshit.

robrichards.bsky.social•1 day ago

Ah “balance”. If only truth had a counter weight.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply