The US military is actually sworn to protect the constitution it is part of the oath. So where as most interventions are of dubious legality, it is just a matter of when someone decides the constitution is being flouted, then it becomes a duty. Not sure it is a call I would want to make.
I have wondered the same on both sides of the argument. Do we think the military command will take steps against their rogue leaders? I suspect not. But it’s going to get ugly very soon I suspect.
Comments