The person arguing for why we should keep public spaces hostile to trans people in this article is a cis women.
Let's stop deifying women.
They can suck just as much and be just as misogonystic as cis men.
I love how they already are complaining about the study being "biased". its like a magic word for them. As soon as *science* disagrees with them, it must be a political agenda and biased.
Especially when that same crowd loves to platform their own dubious "studies" (usually missing a control group) or use out of context statistics as argument.
If I've said it once I've said it a million times: we can tell the difference between a trans woman simply trying to use the bathroom or otherwise exist in peace and a man in a dress with nefarious intentions
The transphobes would never admit that most assault happening in public bathrooms isn't targeted towards *cis women* though. Pretty good way to hide the blood on their hands.
Comments
The problem period.
Like with the world.
Let's stop deifying women.
They can suck just as much and be just as misogonystic as cis men.
Oh right, because transphobes think that their opinions actually matter.
It was never about physical safety.
Seen this play out before.
https://sci-hub.ru/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13178-018-0335-z
It SHOULD be:
“No link between trans-inclusive policies and bathroom safety *RISKS*, study finds”