Seems rather pointless. Many better alternatives like OpenCamera and ProShot that have similar capability and you can actually focus on subjects. A subscription camera app in these days is wild.
Samsung's default photo app has a "pro" setting that exports photos in unprocessed RAW format too. Though yeah it's annoying that the option to turn post-processing off for regular photos isn't even available. But if the whole sales pitch is that it exports in RAW? You can already do that.
No no no no. The idea itself is neat, but 5 free photos a day, otherwise you need to subscribe? For a bare bones camera app with next to no settings? No perpetual license available? That's someone opportunistically and parasitically filling a niche to squeeze people from the other side. No thanks.
I looked into an iOS automation that connected with WebGlaze (since there's no native iOS implementation as far as I can see), but I met the login stumbling-block. Also, it would be probably not be great to add automated load to the WebGlaze service.. but something like that would be nice.
Yeah, I don't think that's something their server can handle at the moment. They're currently working on some back end stuff regarding WebGlaze requests, as well as some other important things, but scaling and opening things up is a sensitive and tricky challenge for sure.
This is what I'm saying. You have zero need to update the app if all it does is take a picture. Guy who made it can just rake it in till the end of time.
Comments
"You can only take five photos per day without paying for a subscription, which costs $0.99 / month or $10.99 USD / year."
No ability to adjust focus. No ability to use flash. No ability to even ZOOM. and only 5 a day without paying?