Is there an economic argument for fully subsidising internet provision or even make it a state owned utility? Do we see the benefits of competition from it being privately operated? Asking from a theoretical perspective, not necessarily US.
Give your history books a look, there were politicians of a conservative bent at the time of electrification that protested providing electricity to the poor.
Well we know the answer to that ruling. A Conservative court cannot support connecting low income folks, who may become educated and then realize the truth about thr gop and MAGA
Comments
E-rate uses USAC and USF where I am at.
We depend on that federal assistance to make Internet financially affordable. With our massive poverty rate we really rely on that.
What terrible news to read tonight.
Actually, you know what...