No, read the article and read the links embedded in the article. The ABA had to restructure their DEI standards because affirmative action was overturned by SCOTUS. They did, but the council said it went too far, so they revised again. Now, they are having to revisit the revision because of the EO.
Comments
They are trying to create language that continues to promote DEI while allowing schools to obey the laws forbidding affirmative action language in their admissions policies.
Wtf. READ IT.
“Allowing schools to obey” is bullshit.
It doesn’t refute Trump & Musk but mitigates some if the damage. This won’t cut it.
When the Death Camps get “approved” by SCOTUS… will you comply?
Or will you grow a spine?
#SeriousQuestion
What I don't get is why you're arguing that revisiting language to allow law schools to comply with the language of the law while still opposing the spirit of the law is not a form of resistance.
Using their stupid, squishy language against them IS resistance. 1/2
The EO says the Bar cannot enforce "illegal DEI," So the obvious response is "we aren't."
*Every* civil servant should have told Trump & Musk to go fuck themselves.
You really don’t understand yet:
There. Is. No. More. Rule. Of. Law.
This is #fascism