A strong statement from the the editors of Reuters, Bloomberg and AP on the White House's decision to change how the news media cover the President reutersagency.com/resources/st... - ThreadSky

eduardosuarez.bsky.social • 1 day ago

A strong statement from the the editors of Reuters, Bloomberg and AP on the White House's decision to change how the news media cover the President
https://reutersagency.com/resources/statement-from-the-editors-of-reuters-the-associated-press-and-bloomberg-news

Comments

elenagraham.bsky.social•1 day ago

📌

lauriemuchnick.bsky.social•1 day ago

How is that a strong statement? What are they planning to do about it?

seangralton.bsky.social•1 day ago

Seems relevant:

https://bsky.app/profile/seangralton.bsky.social/post/3lj3ehzu7hc2v

jnnla.bsky.social•1 day ago

Honestly they need to set aside their integrity and caution in this historical moment. This statement is like bringing a stern warning to a gun-fight.

beltwayskeptic.bsky.social•1 day ago

Also, the National Press Association in DC should STRONGLY recommend that all members decline being approved by the WH unless members covering the President are selected by the association as has been the practice.

querydash.bsky.social•1 day ago

I genuinely don’t mean to sound sarcastic, but: that’s a strong statement?

I was expecting “we will pull our reporters until the edict is rescinded”.

I don’t see what’s particularly strong here, other than stating the obvious and a dash of their own self-importance.

kmfjamie.bsky.social•1 day ago

It’s time to fight fire with fire. Trump and Musk getting fawning sycophantic press. DNC needs a recurring press conference with a charismatic and smart speaker. AP, Reuters etc should cover it.

The old rules no longer apply.

kristopherwhat.bsky.social•1 day ago

I appreciate the statement but I'm disappointed by the lack of a pledge to boycott. The WH pressers are nothing more than performative lying at this point anyway.