It's a fallacy to say that we have to choose between builders and blockers.
We could choose to have to right sorts of development, in the right place, at the right price that would meet our housing needs while protecting our precious natural environment.
We could choose to have to right sorts of development, in the right place, at the right price that would meet our housing needs while protecting our precious natural environment.
Comments
Properly taxing second homes, vacant properties and offshore property portfolios should be an essential part of the mix, naturally.
But 'concrete' building proposals are fundamental to winning this argument.
If you're already housed, good for you. Climate refuge.
I don't know what Greens say where you are, or if you're representative of them, but in UK they haven't suggested a complete moratorium on new-builds yet.
And I would appreciate it if UK people could pipedown a notch or 100 on IQ. I did not get on the list as nr 19 bc Im a damn airhead.
And arguments-from-convenience by the already-housed smack of pulling up the drawbridge.
- and that's a vote-loser which also won't win climate arguments.