Again, we can't really just do that without breaking our current agreements (which I'm not opposed to), but I don't think we should limit it to Ukrainian refugees only. We need to be pushing to change this agreement fully. I would imagine Palestinians refugees & others are also at risk. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

deetoriadee.bsky.social • 2 days ago

Again, we can't really just do that without breaking our current agreements (which I'm not opposed to), but I don't think we should limit it to Ukrainian refugees only. We need to be pushing to change this agreement fully. I would imagine Palestinians refugees & others are also at risk.

Comments

justinbeach.ca•2 days ago

I’m not opposed to simply ending it I’m just opposed to sending children into an active combat zone. If we have to break agreements to prevent that then so be it, but I don’t think we do.

justinbeach.ca•2 days ago

The safe third country agreement says that people have to file their claim in the first safe country they arrive in, it doesn’t prevent us from offering an invitation to whoever we want.

deetoriadee.bsky.social•2 days ago

I believe it does prevent them from filing from a safe country. If they are already in a "safe" country, they can't file. That being said, we absolutely can put out an open invitation to whomever we want, yes. But, as our immigration laws stand now, refugees in the US can't claim refugee status here

deetoriadee.bsky.social•2 days ago

I'm not for sending anyone into a combat zone if they don't want to be there, and I'm happy to break agreements. I'm simply stating what the reality is right now. And I doubt any Canadian politician right now is willing to make this change as we already have ppl crying about immigrants.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply