For the record, Wikipedia actually kind of rules at what it does? It has been a great source of cursory information since at least my high school years.

If LLMs were even half as reliable as Wikipedia, we'd be having a very different conversation.
Some of the anti-AI stuff feels a bit like when people would say "don't use Wikipedia as a source." It's just like anything else, a piece of information that you weigh against multiple sources and your own understanding of its likely failure modes

Comments