I said that this poll shows that most Americans rate the performance of their health insurance as "good" or "excellent," which is as precise a description of the polling as I could muster. What part of that do you think is "out of context" or "a lie"
Reposted from
⧉
I think moreso than the whole ‘take a single data point out of context and lie that is says something it doesnt’ thing, the aspect of will stancil that makes people fucking despise him is that he does this whole ‘enlightened pragmatist’ schtick as cover for just being a fucking stick in the mud
Comments
1. Assuming inconvenient data is false data.
2. An inability to distinguish between "this is true" and "this is true and that's good"
The people who don’t like their insurance are the ones who have found out what it doesn’t do, and
the people who like their insurance are ones without claims who will be moving ti the 1st group eventually
Many don’t understand insurance even in concept. There were highly graded tweets arguing that if you don’t have any auto accidents you should have full refund of premiums.
The inroads to convincing people which works for me is the cost/benefit (don't get enough for paying so much) and the stress of dealing with insurance
Healthcare usage is not spread evenly.
people are not happy with the healthcare system's reliance on being insured. the insurance, if you have it, is fine.
That is not what the data show.
The data show that most people rate their insurance as "good" or "excellent." A person might assume...
1/2
However, other insurances are as bad or worse.
https://www.ahip.org/news/articles/new-poll-strong-majority-of-americans-satisfied-with-employer-provided-health-coverage