But if you need 100% of the grant money to achieve the purpose of the grant, then what’s the point of getting less? And if contracts suddenly dont mean anything, why enter into any?
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I agree with your point in the abstract, but it assumes a competent, benevolent administration which we very obviously do not have. The administration is not going to honor contracts unless they’re forced to do so by a court, and even then that’s iffy. They *might* honor a reduced contract.
And if an org really can’t function at all with a 30% reduction, then that’s the answer to the question. But it doesn’t do any good to respond to a a dichotomous question like this with a third choice that is impossible.
Comments