Viv doesn’t understand that even jack smith is entitled to appropriate legal representation and he can’t have that if his lawyers can’t have access to the actual evidence..
Hi, Amy. I don't think you understood what I was saying - sorry if I was unclear. My point: If prosecutors can't retain security clearances, there is no check on officials doing illegal things and marking them as "secret."
That's right. We need to go to these town halls and arrest the congressman and senators until we can hold new elections. Nobody alive today signed up for fascism.
It wouldn't work if we did it like that. It would need to be massive, and when they're in session. A million+ march on DC. Shut the entire city down. Split into even groups, surround the court, house, and hill, and have ourselves a peaceful seige.
It means I didn't state my point clearly :) Revoking security clearances for prosecutors gives officials freedom to break the law without being held accountable. I'm not for that and think it'll make things worse.
Counterpoint, Viv: Revoking select attorneys' security clearances for providing legal counsel to someone who has been threatened by said Revoker, is unconstitutional, likely illegal and, mostly, petty-as-hell.
Comments