Going through Codewars Katas which I previously wasn't able to solve in under 20 minutes on my first attempt. Figure this one out but it's deceptively simple. HINT: Don't use loops. tinyurl.com/378npjz7 #100Devs #JavaScript - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

aaronboyd47.bsky.social • 76 days ago

Going through Codewars Katas which I previously wasn't able to solve in under 20 minutes on my first attempt. Figure this one out but it's deceptively simple. HINT: Don't use loops.
https://tinyurl.com/378npjz7
#100Devs #JavaScript

Comments

thefishtankie.bsky.social•76 days ago

Here's a one liner I came up with.

thefishtankie.bsky.social•76 days ago

You can leave off the part that guards against the input value too and save another handful of characters.

aaronboyd47.bsky.social•75 days ago

I'm unfamiliar with input. The simplest answer without giving it away involves division.

thefishtankie.bsky.social•75 days ago

Here's a reduced version. The bare array really annoys me, it feels like there should be an Array method that can do something like `Array(6).fill((_, i) => i)` I use lodash/fp for "standard" library stuff. fp specifically so I can use `flow`

thefishtankie.bsky.social•75 days ago

While this is completely silly as an answer to the kata, this pattern of defining single use functions and recombining them with currying is really a nice way of organizing your javascript.

thefishtankie.bsky.social•75 days ago

my import was very funnily written. This is what it should be.

thefishtankie.bsky.social•75 days ago

named variable in an arrow function. Division, it feels like modulus is the more logical way to go, can probably take out some casting too and what have you in mine, I'm definitely using some descriptive declarations and I can probably do a cheaper array.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply