It's fine as a secondary research tool, or for providing quick summaries. What we are going to see is a move away from written assessments back to controlled examinations to counter its use for plagiarism.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
yes, but more than a skill too... it's generative of thinking, i.e. my own scholarship. LLM conflates process with product/output. I dont think we're just nay-saying/thought police on here - these are serious concerns. AI can help in many areas but dont delegate learning to think to it just yet.
if you define 'research tool' as, see what it comes up with and then pick through the output to make sure it's legit then ok... ish... at least that's kinda generative... but the real concern is about accreditation via fraud... lot of it about 😔
Comments