Sorry, perhaps I've misunderstood where you both are coming from - but I think the immunity reward in the challenges has upped the jeopardy, leading to a good amount of "evidence" (as we saw with Freddie not being able to row and his petty reaction causing suspicion).
Arousing too much suspicion (too much "evidence" 😀) makes the game too easy for the faithfuls. That's all I mean. I think the challenges and the way they've been designed have so far have got that right.
Oh I love the show and am really enjoying it, but I do agree that it would be interesting if we didn’t know who the traitors were and could play along with the Faithfuls. It’s so easy to sit at home shouting “it’s Linda, you fools!” when we’ve seen her sneaking around the turret!
A few friends have said they'd like to watch without knowing. But for me, a huge factor in my enjoyment is revelling in the game play of Mina, and Harry and Paul last year. But it would certainly be interesting in not knowing - just not convinced I'd prefer it. Did you know who the Mole was?
No - it was revealed at the same time the contestants found out. I was completely rubbish at guessing who they were and would regularly swear that the Mole was definitely, 100% person X, only for them to be eliminated that week!
Comments