ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
silversoybeans.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Oh! Me and my friends had a headache debating whether or not Mage Armor *counts* as armor
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
cherrybungm.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
It probably doesn't but I meant that since he's a monk, mage armor will prolly be lackluster compared to his unarmored defense.
0
1
reply
[–]
silversoybeans.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Yeah, that’s why. Would a *magic* spell of protection cancel out a monk’s agility from not wearing armor? Our DM got sick of the debate and was like “fffffinnnneeee you can have the extra AC!”
0
1
reply
[–]
cherrybungm.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
but mage armor doesn't give 'extra AC' tho? unless that monk had really low wisdom :0
0
1
reply
[–]
silversoybeans.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Mmm, yes it does? “The target’s base AC becomes 13 + its Dexterity modifier.” So using it on a Monk who already gets free AC would be busted
0
1
reply
[–]
cherrybungm.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
that's the problem tho. Monk's unarmored defense is also 'base AC'
0
1
reply
[–]
silversoybeans.bsky.social
•
91 days ago
Hrm… oh well! That was just us guys bellyaching over rules
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments