a fragment from the good timeline we aren't getting - ThreadSky

ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

michaelcisco.bsky.social • 1 day ago

a fragment from the good timeline we aren't getting

Comments

jonathanlees.bsky.social•1 day ago

Oh yes. That would have been insane.

foxglovefrog.bsky.social•1 day ago

1980 or 60? Can't quiet read it

foxglovefrog.bsky.social•1 day ago

Nm I don't think Variety was a thing in 1960 and that a very 70's font lol

syshapiro.bsky.social•1 day ago

given that cronenberg didn't make his first film until 1969, it'd be wild to do a double-page spread for a movie by a 17-year-old kid nobody had ever heard of

syshapiro.bsky.social•1 day ago

also, variety has actually been around since 1905! just a cool fact

toffphilippo.bsky.social•22 hours ago

Definitely 1980. Same two-page spread in CineMag (May 5, 1980):

matti.town•1 day ago

David wasn’t even in film school in 1960, he would have been maybe 14

tiffanyleigh.bsky.social•1 day ago

Reposting with alt text added so everyone else can suss out the details and context of the image

augh3d.bsky.social•1 day ago

verhoeven's crusade

skeet.best•1 day ago

comes in a two-pack with Jodorowsky's Dune

thromdarr.bsky.social•1 day ago

I didn't have no idea of this 😮

captain-ptero.bsky.social•1 day ago

God, I hope if I dived into that book it would take me there.

markslater.bsky.social•1 day ago

And what did we get? Kenneth fucking Branagh.

rawfishandbeer.bsky.social•1 day ago

Double feature with Guillermo del Toro's At the Mountains of Madness

aferaldavid.bsky.social•1 day ago

@bakoon.bsky.social this would have fucked

madeleineswann.bsky.social•1 day ago

😱

olibobbs.bsky.social•1 day ago

Fucking... *sigh*

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply