So what's longterm cost for nuclear waste? Because if we look at Finland it'll be dirt cheap.
Or do you think waste needs constant spending during all 100k years of what?
In terms of human deaths nuclear is safer than wind
There isn't proliferation risk with npp because their fuel is unsuitable
Or do you think waste needs constant spending during all 100k years of what?
In terms of human deaths nuclear is safer than wind
There isn't proliferation risk with npp because their fuel is unsuitable
Comments