New blog post!
Judge made 'best interests' decision that (previously public) hearing should be PRIVATE when observer turned up for the first time
She used the Civil Procedure Rules
I think this is wrong + creates false impression of transparency.
https://openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2024/09/03/balancing-open-justice-and-ps-right-to-privacy-a-protected-party-says-no-to-a-public-observer-and-her-voice-shall-be-heard/
Judge made 'best interests' decision that (previously public) hearing should be PRIVATE when observer turned up for the first time
She used the Civil Procedure Rules
I think this is wrong + creates false impression of transparency.
https://openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2024/09/03/balancing-open-justice-and-ps-right-to-privacy-a-protected-party-says-no-to-a-public-observer-and-her-voice-shall-be-heard/
Comments