That's no problem. I think we've gotten up to a monophenyl 60-C-20 equivalent, and that's just because we got bored, and had proved enough of a point--this remains unpublished from our group, but basically, yields are good, and it isn't fancy.
Sorry. Remembered who I am talking to. It is incredibly fancy Stu, really fancy. Like would TOTALLY be appropriate for some one-named journals that publish really fancy things. Paradigm shifting even. Important, impactful, and likely to get cited a lot.
Comments
(but we just thought we were being clever)