Why I refuse to “debate” the SeaSpiracy whack-a-doodles:
A debate assumes that both sides are equally valid and the one with the better argument should win.
In science vs. the extremist pseudoscience fringe, that’s not the case, and debating elevates their harmful nonsensical ideas.
A debate assumes that both sides are equally valid and the one with the better argument should win.
In science vs. the extremist pseudoscience fringe, that’s not the case, and debating elevates their harmful nonsensical ideas.
Comments