Thanks for the opinion piece. It's as theoretical as an opposing piece that promotes a cease fire.
The past shows a pattern. Attempts to end bloodshed can not stop because of that. All wars need a cease fire or total enemy destruction.
This has to be played live. So make a good deal and prepare.
The past shows a pattern. Attempts to end bloodshed can not stop because of that. All wars need a cease fire or total enemy destruction.
This has to be played live. So make a good deal and prepare.
Comments
I'm curious to know.. If you had a wand to move the US pieces here, what would you do? Send US troops to Ukraine or Russia? Hyper fund the war? Genuine question.
And this is not about waving magic wands. This is about one country invading another and what the world does to support the sovereignty of the invaded country, not give in to the invaded.
Any choice likely leads to 1 of:
Continue war as is.
Escalate war (nuclear?).
Surrender some land.
No wrong answers. I just want to understand your thoughts. I'd give a deal a try but that doesn't mean I'm right