True - I'm a proponent of limiting US assistance to defensive-defensive (as opposed to offensive-defense like we see in Lebanon, at least IS would claim) weapons support.
Why?
I don't like the idea of a nuclear power being cornered, even if I'm not a fan of the nation (maybe moreso then!).
Israel won’t exist if they use a nuke. They can’t win that fight. We shouldn’t cover defense at this point either. It’s against the law. They are an apartheid regime and violating international law. We embargoed Cuba for decades for less.
A few months ago maybe I would have agreed as a compromise.
Comments
Why?
I don't like the idea of a nuclear power being cornered, even if I'm not a fan of the nation (maybe moreso then!).
A few months ago maybe I would have agreed as a compromise.