CDA PD revoked the security company’s license due to their conduct and their uniforms, I am told. They are asked to conduct responsibilities under city code 5.32, “Security agents”
yep. Other articles indicate he works well with law enforcement, but seems having a cozy relationship is bad idea that grants them powers they should not have.
If they aren't properly registered in Idaho, can that allow for the corporate shield to be pierced easier?
I find it hilarious he deliberately marketed himself as a security firm that can ignore the constitution.
The general answer is yes. It depends on a few factors and the context. The fact that he doesn't prominently identify himself in his marketing as a legal entity hurts him.
Since when does 'speaking out of turn' merit removing someone from a public event? The organizers of that town hall had every intention of silencing opinions they didn't agree with, and they didn't care how the 'security' company did it.
Fuck these fucking mercs! These MAGA assholes are now using a bunch of private citizen mercenaries to terrorize those who oppose them! Well, guess what, assholes? ITS NOT WORKING!!! Thanks to your fascist bullshit, you’re putting a magnifying glass on your unconstitutional un-American insanity.
Comments
Bravo!
This feels weird?
Sorry, CA!
If they aren't properly registered in Idaho, can that allow for the corporate shield to be pierced easier?
The general answer is yes. It depends on a few factors and the context. The fact that he doesn't prominently identify himself in his marketing as a legal entity hurts him.